Analisis Kesenjangan Program P5 melalui Risk Manajemen Worksheet Analys di SMP PGRI Candiroto dan SMP Negeri 1 Candiroto Kabupaten Temanggung

Authors

  • Muhammad Syair
  • Ngurah Ayu Nyoman Murniati Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Soedjono Soedjono Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51874/jips.v4i2.169

Keywords:

P5 program gaps, risk management analysis worksheet

Abstract

This research aims to find out (1) To analyze the gaps in the planning of the project to strengthen the profile of Pancasila students (P5) at driving and non-moving schools at SMP PGRI Candiroto and SMP Negeri 1 Candiroto, Temanggung Regency (2) To analyze the gap in the implementation of the project to strengthen the profile of Pancasila students (P5) at driving schools and non-movers at PGRI Candiroto Middle School and Candiroto 1 Middle School, Temanggung Regency. (3) To analyze the gaps in the evaluation of the project to strengthen the profile of Pancasila students (P5) at driving and non-moving schools at SMP PGRI Candiroto and SMP Negeri 1 Candiroto, Temanggung Regency

This research uses a qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach design. The research subjects are SMP PGRI Candiroto as a driving school and SMP Negeri 1 Candiroto as a non-moving school. Data collection techniques include observation, interviews and documents. Data analysis through the process of data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. Test the validity of the data using credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability tests.

From the research results, it can be concluded that based on the gap analysis of the P5 program through risk management worksheet analysis at SMP PGRI Candiroto and SMP Negeri 1 Candiroto, Temanggungi Regency, the planning sub-focus was influenced by reflecting on mastery of identifying initial readiness in implementing P5. The sub-focus of implementation is influenced by helping students optimally throughout the project activities by encouraging student involvement with strategies for building bonds with students that are well carried out by the teacher. And the sub-focus evaluation gap is caused by a lack of teacher knowledge regarding the goals and principles of P5, and support from teachers other than as part of the P5 team.

References

CNN Indonesia. 2021. Nadiem: Sistem Pendidikan Kita Gagal Edukasi Perubahan Iklim.https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20211117122944-20-722350/nadiem-sistem-pendidikan-kita-gagal-edukasiperubahan- iklim.

Jacob Intan,dkk. 2020. Cause and effect Analysis. Bandung: CRMS Indonesia.

Sugiyono. 2015. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, 2013. Pengendalian Mutu Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah. Bandung: Rafika Aditama.

Yuliastuti S,dkk. 2022. Pelaksanaan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5) Tema Kewirausahaan Kelas 4 SD Labschool UNNES Kota Semarang. Semarang:Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Syair, M., Murniati, N. A. N., & Soedjono, S. (2023). Analisis Kesenjangan Program P5 melalui Risk Manajemen Worksheet Analys di SMP PGRI Candiroto dan SMP Negeri 1 Candiroto Kabupaten Temanggung. Journal of Learning Innovation in Schools, 4(2), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.51874/jips.v4i2.169