Upaya Meningkatkan Administrasi Guru melalui Supervisi Administrasi di SD Negeri Tlogosari Wetan 02 Kota Semarang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51874/jips.v4i2.148Keywords:
Teacher Administrative SupervisionAbstract
The background to this research is the results of the administrative supervision assessment at the initial stage in December, Semester I of the 2021/2022 academic year. From 16 teachers, the following data was obtained: 1 teacher (6%) with good grades, 2 teachers (12.5%) with a sufficient score and 13 people (81.5%) with a poor score and an average administration score of less. This research was conducted in two cycles. In each cycle there are different ways of planning, implementing, observing and reflecting. The research subjects are teachers. The researcher/principal carries out administrative supervision, while the Tlogosari Wetan 02 State Elementary School teacher is both the object and subject in providing administrative supervision. The data collection technique is through class supervision with the stages of supervising teachers in the learning process and observing learning in class, to record important events related to research, especially during the learning process and when the teacher is on break/not teaching. The results of the research show that based on the assessment of teacher administrative supervision above in cycle I, 2 people (12.5%) got a very good score, 7 people (43.75%) got a good score, 7 people (43.75%) got a a sufficient score, and 0 people (0%) got a poor score, or no one got a poor score, with an average of 62.6 (sufficient), so it was necessary to continue to cycle II. Based on the assessment of the teacher's administrative supervision above in cycle II there was an improvement so that the following scores were obtained: 6 people (37.5%) got a very good score, 9 people (56.25%) got a good score, 1 person (6.25%) got a good score %) got sufficient marks, and none (0%) got less marks. So that 9 people got good scores and 6 people got very good marks to 15 people (93.75%) which has exceeded the 70% requirement set, so it can be concluded that administrative supervision can improve teacher administration at SD Negeri Tlogosari Wetan 02, Semester II of 2021 / 2022 lessons, Korsatpen Pedurungan District, Semarang City.
References
Aqib, Zainal. 2016. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Beserta Sistematika Proposal dan Laporannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Engkoswara dan Aan Komariah. 2010. Administrasi Pendidikan, Bandung : Alfabeta Harris dan Benssent, Supervisory Behavior in Educatio. Second Edition , Prentice Hal., Inc: Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey.1971, hal.. 31
Jasmani,Syaiful Mustofa.Supervisi Pendidikan.(Jogjakarta: Ar Ruzz Media, 2013) hal.25-272
Mantja, W. 2008. Profesionalisme Tenaga Kependidikan Manajemen Pendidikan dan Supervisi Pengajaran. Malang: Elang Mas.
M. Ngalim Purwanto. 1987. Psikologi Pendidikan. Remadja Karya, Bandung
Mulyasa. (2006). Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution Abdul Haris. (2016). Manajemen Sarana Dan Prasarana Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa (Studi Multi Kasus di MTsN Pucanglaban Dan MTsN Bandung Tulungagung). Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Negeri Tulungagung.
Siagian, P Sondang, Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Administrasi, Edisi 2 , PT. Gunung Agung, Jakarta, 1973
Soetopo, Hendyat dan Soemanto, Wasty. 1991. Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Kurikulum: Sebagai Substansi Problem Administrasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Soetopo, Hendiyat &Wasty Soemanto. Kepemimpinan dan Supervisi Pendidikan. (Jakarta: BIna AKsara, 1984)
Suharsimi Arikunto & Lia Yuliana. 2008 Manajemen Pendidikan. Aditiya Media Yogyakarta.
Willam H. leffingwell and Edwin M. Robinson '1950, Text book of office management.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Learning Innovation in Schools

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












